Rant of the Week

Balanced Books: Jean Chretien and the Temple of Doom

 

For the first time in 30 years, the annual budget of the Government of Canada will show some black ink.

The immediate response of the Reform Party was to denounce the government for spending some of the new "fiscal dividend", instead of cutting taxes.

The Reform Party is on record as having advocated big tax cuts years ago.  Had we followed Manning's advice then, we would still be facing billions of dollars in deficits, just as the Americans, who cheerfully followed Reagan's advice, are still a few years away from balanced books. 

The Reform Party has a problem.  Most Canadians regard this balanced budget as a significant accomplishment.  Most Canadians, I suspect, are pleased with Chretien and Martin, and a little self-satisfied:  we took the high-road, we suffered years of cuts and sacrifice, but it has finally paid off.   The annual budget is balanced.

If the Reform Party could see themselves, they might hesitate before making the usual partisan jabs at the Liberals.  No one knows for sure, of course, but my guess is that most Canadians are really very pleased about this achievement.  We've gone through a lengthy period of painful sacrifices to get the federal budget under control.  It was difficult, but we did it.  We should be pleased and proud.

Then we see Preston Manning with his bad hair-cut, whining about how this government, the first government in 30 years to bring the budget under control, is irresponsible and shameless because it is putting a few bucks back into some of the programs it's gutted over the last few years.

Preston Manning is being dishonest when he claims to speak for most Canadians when he demands a tax cut.  Most Canadians have indicated over and over again that, yes, while they would like a tax cut,   they also believe that a good chunk of the "fiscal dividend" should go back into some of the social and health programs that make Canada a civilized nation.   This is not a matter of interpretation or fudging the stats: the polls are consistent and decisive on this issue.  Manning is not only wrong but he is also shrill and whiney.  My guess is that the next polls show the Liberals ever farther ahead of Reform than they are now.

So it took a "free-spending liberal" to bring the budget deficit under control.  Mulroney, a conservative couldn't do it.  In the U.S., Reagan, an arch-conservative, not only did not reduce the deficit: he escalated it from about $50 billion to over $450 billion, by cutting taxes (at least, for the rich) and increasing spending on the military. Clinton only now has brought it back under control, though the Americans are a year or two behind Canada. 

Jean Chretien and Paul Martin should get gold medals.   Chretien should get a special shiny gold medal for being lavish with praise for his finance minister.  This is not a leader who is insecure about his position in the party or his ability to lead.  This is a leader who thought that Paul Martin was a pretty smart guy and maybe he should be in charge of getting the deficit down, so he made him Finance Minister and then did the simplest thing possible: left him alone to do his job.

* * *

© Copyright 1998 Bill Van Dyk

All Contents Copyright © Bill Van Dyk
 1998 All Rights Reserved