December 31, 2003
It is believed by some that if you ban fighting in hockey, the incidences of other infractions-- high-sticking, elbowing, slashing-- will increase, because hockey players have a certain amount of brutality in them, and if it doesn't come out in the fists, it has to get out somehow. (Lord knows, Cherry wouldn't want it to emerge in the form of sexual aggression or we might have hazings.)
Is that true? I don't know of any research that supports this belief, but I'm sure that a lot of people believe it anyway because it seems to make sense and because "experts" like Don Cherry believe it.
I think it is an unexamined belief. I don't know of any study that shows that it's true. I know Cherry often liked to claim that European players were dirtier than their brawling North American counter-parts because instead of punching each other in the face like good honest all-American hockey players do, they supposedly hacked at each other more often with their sticks.
Don Cherry also believes that helmets' lead to people hitting each other on the head. Why would you hit someone on the head if he didn't have a helmet on?
To injure him?
Copyright © 2003 Bill Van Dyk All rights reserved.