Rant of the Week

Taking all the trees

 

People own things.  In fact, today, one of the most sacred rights in our society is the right to keep what I have out of your hands.  It's mine. 

This would be good and just if all of us started from zero on the day we were born and only acquired what we actually earned directly from our own labour.  This is the myth a lot of conservatives love to flog: that somehow they earned it.  And those who have nothing didn't work hard enough.

Somewhere, some time in the past, obviously, nobody owned anything.  You are thrown into the world with nothing.  The world is already here, including the trees.

Do some human beings have the innate right to take whatever they want?  If you're a royalist, I guess they do.  For the rest of us, the idea that anything or everything in the world can be taken is repugnant. 

If you're Ayn Rand, life is simple. According to Rand, if you are big enough and strong enough to take it, you should take it, you must take it, you have a divine right to elbow aside those weaker or less ruthless than yourself and take it.  Take it.  Take all of it, without reservation.  Let the sheep tweet about justice and rights-- the only thing that matters is that they can't take it from you.  Unless you have a government.  Damn!  They've organized.

Forget that.  It's not too hard to buy the government.  An assistant to a congressman recently went to work for the Recording Industry of America after sneaking a provision through the back door of some irrelevant legislation granting lavish privileges to their members in the battle against composer's rights.  That is one tiny example among a ocean of cheating. It works pretty well- you won't hear Michelle Bachmann complaining about this kind of deal.  Rick Perry won't complain, obviously, because this is exactly the way he does business all the time in Texas.  There is nothing more maddening in the world than the crowds of inflamed tea-partiers mad for Rick Perry because they actually believe he's going to reduce corruption in government. 

So, back to the trees.  Most people would agree: trees are magnificent.  But not all trees are equally magnificent.  The most magnificent trees are the ones that are 200, 300, 400 years old.  These trees are monumental.  They are gloriously tall and beautiful and endowed with the patina of age and endurance.  Most people would enjoy seeing trees like that.  Even once or twice in your life.

Already back in 1802, Lord Nelson was appalled to discover that few trees suitable for navy shipbuilding were left in England, and requested that replacements be planted and protected for an anticipated 200 years. 

What is really quite shocking is that no one prevented anyone from taking tree after tree after tree until virtually all of the oldest and most beautiful trees had been permanently removed.  Forever.  No one can go back now and see a primeval forest.  No one can recreate a forest of 300-year-old oaks or pines or anything: someone wanted to build or burn or cook, and so the trees were taken. 

The use of these trees was so transient and ephemeral.  The ships or homes or fires made are all long gone.  So is the forest.  When my wife and I walk through the forests of Ontario for pleasure, we cannot be unaware of the fact that all of the trees were are looking at infants compared to what might have been there if only the government had said, "no, you can't take every single tree.  Leave some forests for the future".  No, they said "screw the future-- take every last one." 

Michelle Bachmann and Rick Perry both want to excise the Environmental Protection Agency from American life and allow oil companies to drill everywhere, any time, without annoying restrictions, regulations, or consumer protections.  In fact, it appears that they both want to give the oil to the oil companies in the bizarre belief that citizens have no rights to the resources that exist under the ground in their own country.

 

 

All Contents Copyright © Bill Van Dyk 2011 All Rights Reserved