The Value of a Human Life

How many times have you heard someone say that– “you can’t put a value on human life”. Yes, you can. Yes, we do. All the time.

We love to say it but we don’t mean it ourselves. If the government proposed raising our taxes by 50% to pay for a ream of new hospitals, clinics, emergency ward staff, helicopters, and defibrillators, they would be tossed out of office at the very next election. We don’t mean it.

We know that millions of people are starving to death at this moment in Darfur and Somalia. I don’t think a single person in Canada has proposed increasing our aid to those people since the economy went into the tank. How can you possibly put value on a life?

What we mean is, “you can’t put a limit on how much we want other people to pay for a human life that matters to us.”

The irony is that we often, in fact, end up putting less value on a human life when we have these knee-jerk responses to a crisis.

It is this kind of thinking that leads governments and individuals to spend huge sums of money on services and products that seem to protect life, when the same amount of money spent more wisely, on prevention, for example, would save far more human lives. It’s that same old human impulse. When a section of road is unsafe because it is too “expensive” to build a proper bridge or change the angle of the curve or widen the pavement, we panic and buy more ambulances and end up spending more money than it would have cost to fix the problem in the first place.

Case in point: a few years ago a child strangled to death playing on a jungle gym in a school play-ground in Toronto.  “You can’t put a price on a- human life” said the Toronto school board.  They removed all of the play ground equipment at all the schools in Toronto, eventually replacing them with better playground equipment that was deemed more safe.  But the children who normally played in these school years went elsewhere to play while the equipment was on order, and more of them were killed in accidents than could possibly have died from strangulation on the old equipment.

Besides, the whole notion that you “can’t put a value on human life” cuts two ways. In the case of a lawsuit against a corporation whose negligence caused a wrongful death– might not a judge decide that it would be crass to aware a specific amount of money to a plaintiff, because, you can’t put a value on human life.


“I heard about it and I was like, ‘Are you kidding me?’ How can they possibly put a value on a life?’ ” said Debra Moran of Preston, who credits Life Star helicopter with helping to save her 16-year-old son last summer. He was critically injured in an ATV crash in Ledyard, 55 miles from Hartford and the nearest trauma center. “Would they say a respirator is too expensive and they are not going to have an I.C.U. anymore?” she said.

Gorilla Bars

When the children of Toronto came to school this September, a little surprise was waiting for them. In their playgrounds, instead of monkey bars, slides, and jungle gyms, they found… nothing.

Yes, the Toronto School Board decided to rip out 172 sets of playground equipment and take them away. Are they buying new equipment? No. They don’t have enough money to do that. It will cost about $27 million to replace them. That’s right: $27 MILLION.

What happened? Did a lot of parents complain about children getting injured on the equipment? No. Did someone die? No. Did the insurance premiums suddenly go up? No.

What happened was this. An inspector from Ottawa had created a report that laid out some guidelines for new playground equipment, with the laudable goal of ensuring that they would be as safe as possible. The new guidelines were better than the old guidelines, of course. Some clever people have found ways to build playground equipment that is safer than ever before.

The Toronto School Board, having received their new guidelines, hired an inspector from a private service to check all of their playground equipment to see if they conformed with the new guidelines. They did not, of course. The old playground equipment is, well, old.

As it turns out, the old playground equipment was not very bad at all. Out of the hundreds of thousands of children who had played on them, no one had ever been killed, nor, apparently, were there many serious injuries. In fact, more children are injured on the paved areas of the playground and the yard than on the playground equipment.

Still, no cost is too high when it comes to children’s safety. Except for the cost of common sense and rationality. The Toronto School Board ordered 172 sets of old playground equipment removed, on the off chance that someone, some day, might get hurt really bad. Not including the children who now play on the paved areas of the playground.

The head of the school board defends this decision. “No cost is too high.” Well, then, why not hire individual bodyguards to follow every child around all day to make sure the child never gets hurt? But that would be ridiculous. Why would it be ridiculous? Because it would cost too much. It would be too expensive. It would be unreasonable. The cost would be too high. There you go.

The head of the school board is a liar.

Now the School Board is going to go to the parents– whose opinions about removing the equipment they did not seek– and ask for donations to pay for new equipment.

The irony is that the man who was in charge of the Toronto School Board’s equipment originally has stated that the old equipment was fine. But of course, they didn’t hire him to do the inspections– they hired a consultant. From an outside firm. Just so someone on the school board could cover her ass.

He even said that when it was first installed, the number of reportable “incidents” went down, because, with the jungle-gyms to occupy them, fewer children got into trouble rough-housing or fighting in the school yard.

Sounds like the guy has some sense.